Packet 10: Bonus 11
This theory’s “first revolution” began in 1984 after Green and Schwarz successfully produced anomaly cancellations in its “type I” form. For 10 points each:
[10e] Name this theory in which everything is completely described in terms of namesake one-dimensional objects.
ANSWER: string theory [accept superstring theory or supersymmetric string theory]
[10h] Following the development of type I and II string theories, the “Princeton string quartet” developed two heterotic superstring theories labelled “HO” (“H-O”) and “HE” (“H-E”) that have these gauge groups. Name either.
ANSWER: SO(32) OR E8 cross E8 [accept special orthogonal group of degree 32 in place of “SO(32)”]
[10m] The “second revolution” began when this American physicist formulated M-theory by combining the five superstring theories into 11 dimensions. Along with Weinberg, this Fields Medal winner names a theorem that prevents gravitons from being composite particles.
ANSWER: Edward Witten
<Editors, Physics> | S. Playoffs 10 (Editors 10)
| Heard | PPB | E % | M % | H % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 | 15.42 | 96% | 54% | 4% |
Conversion
| Team | Opponent | Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Total | Parts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| British Columbia | Toronto B | 10 | 0 | 10 | 20 | EM |
| Brown | Swarthmore | 10 | 10 | 10 | 30 | EHM |
| Bruin | Rutgers | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Cambridge | UCLA | 10 | 0 | 10 | 20 | EM |
| Harvard | NYU A | 10 | 0 | 10 | 20 | EM |
| Illinois B | Georgetown | 10 | 0 | 10 | 20 | EM |
| MIT | Vanderbilt | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Maryland B | Cornell | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Michigan | Georgia Tech A | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Minnesota | Pittsburgh | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | E |
| NYU B | Georgia Tech B | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | E |
| North Carolina | Purdue | 10 | 0 | 10 | 20 | EM |
| Northwestern A | Chicago A | 10 | 0 | 10 | 20 | EM |
| Northwestern B | Waterloo | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Ohio State | Johns Hopkins | 10 | 0 | 10 | 20 | EM |
| Penn State | Virginia | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Stanford A | Columbia A | 10 | 0 | 10 | 20 | EM |
| Stanford B | Columbia B | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Texas | Illinois A | 10 | 0 | 10 | 20 | EM |
| Toronto A | Maryland A | 10 | 0 | 10 | 20 | EM |
| UC Berkeley B | Indiana | 10 | 0 | 10 | 20 | EM |
| UCF | Chicago B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Virginia Tech | UC Berkeley A | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | E |
| WashU | Georgia Tech C | 10 | 0 | 10 | 20 | EM |
Summary
| Tournament | Edition | Match | Heard | PPB | E % | M % | H % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main Site | 2026-04-17 | ✓ | 24 | 15.42 | 96% | 54% | 4% |