Packet 8: Tossup 16

Description acceptable. William Riker argues that these systems form when a namesake “bargain” occurs under duress. Yingyi Qian (“ch’yen”) and Barry Weingast argue that these systems are credible commitments to market incentives in a “Chinese style.” Wallace Oates founded a field studying “fiscal” forms of these systems inspired by the Tiebout (“TEE-bo”) model. These systems are protected by Germany’s Bundestreue (“BOON-diss-TROY-uh”) doctrine, Canada’s pith and substance test, and the anti-commandeering doctrine. (10[2])These systems often allow for “equalization transfers.” (10[1]-5[1])India has (10[1])a “quasi” type of these (10[1])systems. (-5[1])US jurisprudence contrasts “layer cake” and “marble cake” (10[3])models (10[3])of this (10[1])system, (10[3])which (10[2])allegedly creates “laboratories of democracy.” For 10 points, name this type of system preserved by the Tenth Amendment, (10[2])in which regional governments retain significant powers and form a “non-unitary” state. ■END■ (10[1])

ANSWER: federalism [or federal systems or word forms; accept federations or confederacies or word forms; accept descriptions of having powerful state or provincial governments or of states’ rights or provincial powers; prompt on descriptions of local governments; prompt on decentralization or word forms; prompt on enumerated powers or separation of powers; prompt on constitutional systems or word forms; reject “devolution” or word forms; reject descriptions of powerful “municipal or city or town governments”]
<Georgia Tech C, Social Science> | H. Prelims 8 - Stanford A + Georgia Tech C + Columbia A + Columbia B
= Average correct buzzpoint

Back to tossups