Packet 4: Tossup 6

Description acceptable. Barry Dainton modified an argument about this idea by introducing “neural ancestors” to it. A 2022 book by David Chalmers argues for “signs” that this idea may be true, such as humans living early in the universe’s timeline. The paper that introduced this idea uses anthropic reasoning (10[1])to present a “trilemma” (10[1])in which a mechanism is either not possible, (-5[1])banned from occurring, (-5[1])or very common. (-5[1])Subjects of this idea (-5[1])either emerge “it-from-bit” or have (10[1])a biological basis like Putnam’s “brain in a vat.” This idea was introduced in a 2003 paper (10[1])by Nick (10[1])Bostrom, (-5[2])which (10[1])asserts (-5[1])that (-5[1])if (10[1])advanced civilizations (-5[3])can easily create artificial (10[1])consciousness, (10[1])then living in this situation (10[2])is much more likely than (10[1])living in “base reality.” For 10 points, what idea (10[1])proposes that the universe might be rendered by a machine, like (10[1])the world in The Matrix? ■END■ (10[10])

ANSWER: simulation hypothesis [or simulation argument; accept descriptions indicating that reality, mankind, humans, or consciousness exists inside a simulation or inside a computer; accept descriptions indicating that humans live in or that reality consists of a virtual world; accept the truth of digital physics] (The Chalmers book is Reality+: Virtual Worlds and the Problems of Philosophy.)
<Editors, Philosophy> | M. Playoffs 4 (Editors 4)
= Average correct buzzpoint

Back to tossups