Packet 6: Bonus 2
William E. Cross, Jr.’s psychological theory of this identity’s development is used in a 1997 popular press book to explain why those with it are “sitting together in the cafeteria.” For 10 points each:
[10e] Name this ethnic identity primed in the original study of stereotype threat. W. E. B. Du Bois (“doo BOYSS”) theorized a “double consciousness” characteristic of this identity.
ANSWER: Black identity [or African American identity; accept word forms such as Blackness]
[10m] Cross contrasted his identity development model with one created by this psychologist, who wrote a book analyzing a young man who exclaimed “I am not!” during a choir practice.
ANSWER: Erik Erikson [or Erik Homburger Erikson; accept Erik Salomonsen] (The book is Young Man Luther.)
[10h] This ex-president of Spelman College proposed optimal pedagogy for “Talking About Race, Learning About Racism.” This psychologist wrote Why Are All the Black Kids Sitting Together in the Cafeteria?
ANSWER: Beverly Daniel Tatum
<Editors, Social Science> | O. Playoffs 6 (Editors 6)
| Heard | PPB | E % | M % | H % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 | 12.08 | 100% | 21% | 0% |
Conversion
| Team | Opponent | Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Total | Parts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chicago B | Waterloo | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Columbia A | Toronto A | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 | EM |
| Columbia B | Bruin | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Cornell | Swarthmore | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Georgetown | Brown | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Georgia Tech C | UCLA | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Indiana | Stanford A | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 | EM |
| Johns Hopkins | Georgia Tech A | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Maryland A | Harvard | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 | EM |
| Michigan | Penn State | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Minnesota | British Columbia | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | E |
| NYU A | Chicago A | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | E |
| North Carolina | Northwestern B | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Ohio State | NYU B | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Purdue | Illinois B | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Rutgers | Georgia Tech B | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Texas | Pittsburgh | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Toronto B | MIT | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | E |
| UC Berkeley A | UC Berkeley B | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 | EM |
| UCF | Maryland B | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Vanderbilt | Cambridge | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Virginia | Stanford B | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | E |
| Virginia Tech | Northwestern A | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 | EM |
| WashU | Illinois A | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | E |
Summary
| Tournament | Edition | Match | Heard | PPB | E % | M % | H % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main Site | 2026-04-17 | ✓ | 24 | 12.08 | 100% | 21% | 0% |